Google PageRank for AI agents. 25,000+ tools indexed.

4D-ARE MCP Server

ybeven/4D-ARE

Score: 64.0 Rank #5258 Agent Framework
[![AgentRank](https://agentrank-ai.com/api/v1/badge/ybeven--4D-ARE)](https://agentrank-ai.com/tool/ybeven--4D-ARE/?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=readme&utm_campaign=agentrank_badge)
Are you the maintainer of ybeven/4D-ARE? Claim this listing →

Build LLM agents that explain why, not just what. Attribution-driven agent requirements engineering framework. Based on the 4D-ARE Paper - https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04556

Add AgentRank to Claude Code Discover and compare tools like ybeven/4D-ARE — your AI finds the right one automatically
Get API Access →
claude mcp add agentrank -- npx -y agentrank-mcp-server

Overview

ybeven/4D-ARE is a Python tool licensed under MIT. Build LLM agents that explain why, not just what. Attribution-driven agent requirements engineering framework. Based on the 4D-ARE Paper - https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04556 Topics: agents, causal-reasoning, llm, mcp, prompt-engineering, python.

Ranked #5258 out of 24846 indexed tools.

Ecosystem

Python MIT
agentscausal-reasoningllmmcpprompt-engineeringpython

Score Breakdown

StarsFreshnessIssue HealthContributorsDependents
Stars 15% 182

182 stars → growing community

Freshness 25% 17d ago

Last commit 17d ago → recently updated

Issue Health 25% 50%

No issues filed → no history to score

Contributors 10% 1

1 contributor → solo project

Dependents 25% 0

No dependents → no downstream usage

npm Downloads N/A
PyPI Downloads N/A
Forks 19
Description Detailed
License MIT

Weights: Freshness 20% · Issue Health 20% · Dependents 22% · Stars 10% · Contributors 8% · How we score →

How to Improve

Contributors medium impact

Single-contributor projects carry bus-factor risk — welcoming contributors boosts confidence

Dependents medium impact

No downstream dependents detected yet — adoption by other projects is the strongest trust signal

Badge all embed codes →

AgentRank score for ybeven/4D-ARE
[![AgentRank](https://agentrank-ai.com/api/v1/badge/ybeven--4D-ARE)](https://agentrank-ai.com/tool/ybeven--4D-ARE/?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=readme&utm_campaign=agentrank_badge)
<a href="https://agentrank-ai.com/tool/ybeven--4D-ARE/?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=readme&utm_campaign=agentrank_badge"><img src="https://agentrank-ai.com/api/v1/badge/ybeven--4D-ARE" alt="AgentRank"></a>

Embed Widget docs →

Embed a rich score widget on your site or blog.

<script src="https://agentrank-ai.com/embed.js" data-tool="ybeven/4D-ARE"></script>

Matched Queries

topic:mcp

From the README

# 4D-ARE: Attribution-Driven Agent Requirements Engineering

> Build LLM agents that explain *why*, not just *what*.

## The Problem

Your LLM agent has full data access and executes flawlessly. But when asked:

> "Why is our customer retention rate only 56%?"

It returns a list of metrics instead of a causal explanation:

```
Retention rate: 56%
Visit frequency: 2.1
Cross-sell rate: 28%
...
```

**This is the Attribution Gap** - agents can report *what* happened, but struggle to explain *why*.

## The Solution

4D-ARE provides a framework for building agents that trace causal chains through 4 dimensions:

```
Results (What happened)
    ↓
Process (What we did)
    ↓
Support (What resources we had)
    ↓
Long-term (What environment we're in)
```

Instead of a metric dump, you get:

```
Results: Retention dropped to 56% (target: 80%)
    ↑ caused by
Process: Visit frequency declined 23%, cross-sell rate low
    ↑ constrained by
Support: Staffing ratio at 68%, understaffed
    ↑ driven b
Read full README on GitHub →

Get the weekly AgentRank digest

Top movers, new tools, ecosystem insights — straight to your inbox.